Hoppa till innehåll

Omslag till Navigating the TMDL Process

Navigating the TMDL Process

Av

Häftad · Engelska · 192 sidor

Format
Häftad
Språk
Engelska
Omfång
192 sidor
Förlag
Unknown

A key step in the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations for water bodies impaired due to sediment toxicity is the identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures (TIEs) are one of the primary tools used in this process. This project evaluated standardized and recently developed sediment TIE methods developed by the US EPA and others, to determine their utility for identifying chemicals responsible for toxicity. In this study, formulated sediments were spiked with five chemicals: copper, fluoranthene, tetrachlorobenzene, nonylphenol and ammonia Experiments were conducted using sediments spiked with single chemicals and chemical mixtures. Toxicity tests used the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius and the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. TIEs were conducted using solid-phase (whole sediment) and sediment interstitial waters. Results indicate that the TIE methods are sufficient to characterize and identify toxicity due to single and multiple chemicals using spiked sediments. One key finding from the spiked sediment experiments is that methods to elute chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs require further refinement to ensure complete and consistent elution of sorbed chemicalsAn additional finding is that both solid-phase and interstitial water TIE procedures provide useful lines of evidence and that both approaches should be used in a weight-of-evidence approach in the sediment TIE process. In the final phase of this project, we evaluated the TIE procedures using ambient samples collected from three marine sites and three freshwater sites Marine sediments were collected from Switzer Creek in San Diego Bay, Upper Newport Bay in Newport Beach, and Consolidated Slip, in Long Beach Harbor, all of which are sites in southern California. Freshwater sediments were collected from two additional sites in California: San Diego Creek, in Newport Beach, and Alisal Slough, in Salinas. The final freshwater sediment was collected from a site in Indiana Harbor. Multiple solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs were conducted on each sediment and results of these were combined with chemical analyses and other lines-of-evidence to evaluate the methods. The results indicate that sediment TIE methods are sufficiently developed to characterize toxicity due to general classes of chemicals such as cationic metals, organic chemicals, and ammonia. Methods to improve extraction and elution of metal and organic chemicals in highly toxic sediments require further refinement in order to allow identification of specific chemicals responsible for toxicity as part of the Phase II TIE process. These refinements include determining the appropriate masses of solid-phase extraction media to allow complete removal of toxic chemicals from sediments and interstitial watersIn addition, we recommend that additional studies be designed t...

A key step in the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations for water bodies impaired due to sediment toxicity is the identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures (TIEs) are one of the primary tools used in this process. This project evaluated standardized and recently developed sediment TIE methods developed by the US EPA and others, to determine their utility for identifying chemicals responsible for toxicity. In this study, formulated sediments were spiked with five chemicals: copper, fluoranthene, tetrachlorobenzene, nonylphenol and ammonia Experiments were conducted using sediments spiked with single chemicals and chemical mixtures. Toxicity tests used the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius and the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. TIEs were conducted using solid-phase (whole sediment) and sediment interstitial waters. Results indicate that the TIE methods are sufficient to characterize and identify toxicity due to single and multiple chemicals using spiked sediments. One key finding from the spiked sediment experiments is that methods to elute chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs require further refinement to ensure complete and consistent elution of sorbed chemicalsAn additional finding is that both solid-phase and interstitial water TIE procedures provide useful lines of evidence and that both approaches should be used in a weight-of-evidence approach in the sediment TIE process. In the final phase of this project, we evaluated the TIE procedures using ambient samples collected from three marine sites and three freshwater sites Marine sediments were collected from Switzer Creek in San Diego Bay, Upper Newport Bay in Newport Beach, and Consolidated Slip, in Long Beach Harbor, all of which are sites in southern California. Freshwater sediments were collected from two additional sites in California: San Diego Creek, in Newport Beach, and Alisal Slough, in Salinas. The final freshwater sediment was collected from a site in Indiana Harbor. Multiple solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs were conducted on each sediment and results of these were combined with chemical analyses and other lines-of-evidence to evaluate the methods. The results indicate that sediment TIE methods are sufficiently developed to characterize toxicity due to general classes of chemicals such as cationic metals, organic chemicals, and ammonia. Methods to improve extraction and elution of metal and organic chemicals in highly toxic sediments require further refinement in order to allow identification of specific chemicals responsible for toxicity as part of the Phase II TIE process. These refinements include determining the appropriate masses of solid-phase extraction media to allow complete removal of toxic chemicals from sediments and interstitial watersIn addition, we recommend that additional studies be designed t...

Lägsta pris1 639kr1 747 krPrisfall 6% jämfört med butikens tidigare prisBookHero · Fri frakt · Leverans 1-5 vardagar

Priser & butiker

Pris
Inkl. frakt

Priser & butiker

2 butiker · Häftad · lägsta pris först

Skriver du om boken på en blogg eller sajt? .

BookHeroBäst

1 747 kr

1 639 kr

Leverans 1-5 vardagar

Bookoutlet

2 706 kr

Leverans 2-8 vardagar

Amazon
Kan finnas hos Amazon
⭐2.0 · Trustpilot (2k)
Frakt från 19 kr
Kan finnas hos Amazon
Frakt från 19 kr
Se aktuellt pris
Bokbörsen
Kan finnas begagnad
Frakt från 62 kr
Kan finnas begagnad
Frakt från 62 kr
Se begagnade
Bästa pris just nu
Prisfall -6%
39 % billigare
1

BookHero

BookHero

1 747 kr

1 639 kr

Visa hos butik
Fri frakt
Leverans 1-5 vardagar
Frakt
Frakt från 39 kr · fri frakt över 399 kr
Leverans
1-5 vardagar. Levereras hem, till ombud eller till paketskåp. Skickas med Early Bird, Instabox, Budbee Box eller DB Schenker.
Betalning
Kort · Swish · Faktura 14 dagar · Delbetalning
Öppet köp
14 dagars öppet köp
Omdöme
3.7 av 5 på Trustpilot (728 omdömen)
2

Bookoutlet

Bookoutlet
Fri frakt
Leverans 2-8 vardagar
Frakt
Frakt från 25 kr · fri frakt över 169 kr
Leverans
2-8 vardagar. Levereras hem eller till ombud. Skickas med PostNord.
Betalning
Kort · Faktura 14 dagar · Delbetalning · Direktbank
Öppet köp
14 dagars öppet köp
Omdöme
1.4 av 5 på Trustpilot (1 561 omdömen)

Amazon

Amazon
Frakt från 19 kr
Kan finnas hos Amazon

Bokbörsen

Bokbörsen
Frakt från 62 kr
Kan finnas begagnad
Bästa pris just nu
Prisfall -6%
39 % billigare
1

BookHero

BookHero

1 747 kr

1 639 kr

Visa hos butik
⭐3.7 · Trustpilot (728)
Fri frakt
Leverans 1-5 vardagar
Frakt
Frakt från 39 kr · fri frakt över 399 kr
Leverans
1-5 vardagar. Levereras hem, till ombud eller till paketskåp. Skickas med Early Bird, Instabox, Budbee Box eller DB Schenker.
Betalning
Kort · Swish · Faktura 14 dagar · Delbetalning
Öppet köp
14 dagars öppet köp
Omdöme
3.7 av 5 på Trustpilot (728 omdömen)
2

Bookoutlet

Bookoutlet
⭐1.4 · Trustpilot (2k)
Fri frakt
Leverans 2-8 vardagar
Frakt
Frakt från 25 kr · fri frakt över 169 kr
Leverans
2-8 vardagar. Levereras hem eller till ombud. Skickas med PostNord.
Betalning
Kort · Faktura 14 dagar · Delbetalning · Direktbank
Öppet köp
14 dagars öppet köp
Omdöme
1.4 av 5 på Trustpilot (1 561 omdömen)

Amazon

Amazon
⭐2.0 · Trustpilot (2k)
Frakt från 19 kr
Kan finnas hos Amazon

Bokbörsen

Bokbörsen
Frakt från 62 kr
Kan finnas begagnad

Samma ISBN jämförs hos alla butiker — priserna gäller samma utgåva.

Annonslänkar: Booki kan få provision när du handlar via våra länkar. Det påverkar inte ditt pris. Externa länkar utan pris ingår inte i jämförelsen.

Annonslänkar: Booki kan få provision när du handlar via våra länkar. Det påverkar inte ditt pris. Externa länkar utan pris ingår inte i jämförelsen.

Samma ISBN jämförs hos alla butiker — priserna gäller samma utgåva.

Håll koll på priset

Väntar du på ett lägre pris?

Håll koll på priset

Väntar du på ett lägre pris?

Bevaka priset på denna utgåva av Navigating the TMDL Process och få besked när det sjunker.

Spara den här boken

Logga in för att lägga till i din bokhylla, bevaka priset och recensera.

Om boken

A key step in the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations for water bodies impaired due to sediment toxicity is the identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures (TIEs) are one of the primary tools used in this process. This project evaluated standardized and recently developed sediment TIE methods developed by the US EPA and others, to determine their utility for identifying chemicals responsible for toxicity. In this study, formulated sediments were spiked with five chemicals: copper, fluoranthene, tetrachlorobenzene, nonylphenol and ammonia Experiments were conducted using sediments spiked with single chemicals and chemical mixtures. Toxicity tests used the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius and the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. TIEs were conducted using solid-phase (whole sediment) and sediment interstitial waters. Results indicate that the TIE methods are sufficient to characterize and identify toxicity due to single and multiple chemicals using spiked sediments. One key finding from the spiked sediment experiments is that methods to elute chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs require further refinement to ensure complete and consistent elution of sorbed chemicalsAn additional finding is that both solid-phase and interstitial water TIE procedures provide useful lines of evidence and that both approaches should be used in a weight-of-evidence approach in the sediment TIE process. In the final phase of this project, we evaluated the TIE procedures using ambient samples collected from three marine sites and three freshwater sites Marine sediments were collected from Switzer Creek in San Diego Bay, Upper Newport Bay in Newport Beach, and Consolidated Slip, in Long Beach Harbor, all of which are sites in southern California. Freshwater sediments were collected from two additional sites in California: San Diego Creek, in Newport Beach, and Alisal Slough, in Salinas. The final freshwater sediment was collected from a site in Indiana Harbor. Multiple solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs were conducted on each sediment and results of these were combined with chemical analyses and other lines-of-evidence to evaluate the methods. The results indicate that sediment TIE methods are sufficiently developed to characterize toxicity due to general classes of chemicals such as cationic metals, organic chemicals, and ammonia. Methods to improve extraction and elution of metal and organic chemicals in highly toxic sediments require further refinement in order to allow identification of specific chemicals responsible for toxicity as part of the Phase II TIE process. These refinements include determining the appropriate masses of solid-phase extraction media to allow complete removal of toxic chemicals from sediments and interstitial watersIn addition, we recommend that additional studies be designed t...

A key step in the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations for water bodies impaired due to sediment toxicity is the identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures (TIEs) are one of the primary tools used in this process. This project evaluated standardized and recently developed sediment TIE methods developed by the US EPA and others, to determine their utility for identifying chemicals responsible for toxicity. In this study, formulated sediments were spiked with five chemicals: copper, fluoranthene, tetrachlorobenzene, nonylphenol and ammonia Experiments were conducted using sediments spiked with single chemicals and chemical mixtures. Toxicity tests used the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius and the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. TIEs were conducted using solid-phase (whole sediment) and sediment interstitial waters. Results indicate that the TIE methods are sufficient to characterize and identify toxicity due to single and multiple chemicals using spiked sediments. One key finding from the spiked sediment experiments is that methods to elute chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs require further refinement to ensure complete and consistent elution of sorbed chemicalsAn additional finding is that both solid-phase and interstitial water TIE procedures provide useful lines of evidence and that both approaches should be used in a weight-of-evidence approach in the sediment TIE process. In the final phase of this project, we evaluated the TIE procedures using ambient samples collected from three marine sites and three freshwater sites Marine sediments were collected from Switzer Creek in San Diego Bay, Upper Newport Bay in Newport Beach, and Consolidated Slip, in Long Beach Harbor, all of which are sites in southern California. Freshwater sediments were collected from two additional sites in California: San Diego Creek, in Newport Beach, and Alisal Slough, in Salinas. The final freshwater sediment was collected from a site in Indiana Harbor. Multiple solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs were conducted on each sediment and results of these were combined with chemical analyses and other lines-of-evidence to evaluate the methods. The results indicate that sediment TIE methods are sufficiently developed to characterize toxicity due to general classes of chemicals such as cationic metals, organic chemicals, and ammonia. Methods to improve extraction and elution of metal and organic chemicals in highly toxic sediments require further refinement in order to allow identification of specific chemicals responsible for toxicity as part of the Phase II TIE process. These refinements include determining the appropriate masses of solid-phase extraction media to allow complete removal of toxic chemicals from sediments and interstitial watersIn addition, we recommend that additional studies be designed t...

Bokfakta

Format

Häftad

Sidantal

192

Språk

Engelska

ISBN

9781843397663

Kategorier

Övrigt
PrisfaktaBilligast just nu: 1 639 kr hos BookHero · 2 butiker jämförda · Prisfall 6 % nyligen
Verifierade priser
Uppdateras flera gånger per dag
Oberoende jämförelse